Mrs. Coppola's First Period Class Responses

Name Age Location	Response
Carissa 14 Pt. Jeff. Sta., NY	Q1: What document did the Supreme Court call unconstitutional? A1: The supreme court called the unconstitutional the Missouri compromise. Q2: How would this bring about a big change in the transporting of slaves in the U.S.? A2: It led the slave extension party. the five judges are slaveholders and the others were making states laws bend to federal demands in behalf of" the Southern institution." Q3: Did the writer of this article support the Dred Scott Decision? A3: Yes, because it led the Missouri compromise allow the people know what to read and what is interesting. Q4: How has this changed who makes the laws for personal property of citizens of the U.S. in federal territory? A4: The laws for personal property changed laws for the people to have more property for slaves. Q5: What does this picture represent? A5: This picture represents a free state because the slaves were free in the Missouri compromise. Q6: How does the picture show the changes that Dred Scott court case brought about in U.S. culture? A6: It changed by letting people know what was interesting about the article and about the changed law.
Deniz Y. 13 Pt. Jeff. Sta., NY	Q1: What document did the Supreme Court call unconstitutional? A1: The Supreme Court thought the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. Q2: How would this bring about a big change in the transporting of slaves in the U.S.? A2: This would bring a big change in the transportation of slaves in the U.S. by having more slaves involved in the transportation. Q3: Did the writer of this article support the Dred Scott Decision? A3: No, the writer of this article did not support the Dred Scott Decision. Q4: How has this changed who makes the laws for personal property of citizens of the U.S. in federal territory? A4: This has changed who makes the laws for personal property of citizens of the U.S. in federal territory by allowing the citizens to make the laws. Q5: What does this picture represent? A5: This picture represents peace between the south, Indians and everyone threw out America. Q6: How does the picture show the changes that Dred Scott court case brought about in U.S. culture? A6: This picture shows changes by showing peace instead of war.
Michele 52 Wisconsin	Q1: What document did the Supreme Court call unconstitutional? A1: The Missouri Compromise was considered to be unconstitutional. Many at the time felt that Congress could not prevent the spread of slavery into other territories. Q2: How would this bring about a big change in the transporting of slaves in the U.S.? A2: Slave holders would be careful not to travel close to free borders. Entering free territories could mean freedom for slaves if they escaped. Q3: Did the writer of this article support the Dred Scott Decision? A3: Based on the second paragraph, I think the author did not support the Dred Scott decision. Q4:How has this changed who makes the laws for personal property of citizens of the U.S. in federal territory? A4: Not sure Q5: What does this picture represent? A5: To me this picture has a dual meaning, depending on certain points of view! Many times Blacks have been depicted as the banjo or fiddler playing darkie, entertaining whites. However, the picture can also represent change. Blacks having politicians dancing to their music..paying attention to the needs of blacks as citizens! However, the change will be slow. Politicians must also pay attention to (dance to the music of) women, Native Americans, all kinds of people! However, there are still some people who will dance with the devil (evil-doers)! Q6: How does the picture show the changes that Dred Scott court case brought about in U.S. culture? A6: Some were willing to change, some were not. Change has been very slowly calculated.