Name |
Response |
Lauren Age: 15 New York |
Q1: Compare the views of
Peter Ward to Daniel Simberloff. A1: Peter Ward's views are different because he thinks mass extinction will happen quicker then Daniel Simberloff beliefs.
Q2: Why would Peter
Ward refer to Homo sapiens as an "asteroid?" |
Kawoen Age: 16 New York |
Q1: Compare the views of
Peter Ward to Daniel Simberloff. A1: Peter ward thinks that a mass extinction kills species and Daniel Simberloff thinks nature of the impacts of introduces species on native species and ecosystems allows inferences about extinction rates. Q2: Why would Peter Ward refer to Homo sapiens as an
"asteroid?" |
Tim Age: 14 New York |
Q1: Compare the views of Peter Ward to Daniel Simberloff. A1:Peter Ward and Daniel Simberloff have the same ideas pretty much. They both agree that mass extinction will effect the environment and nature greatly. They both express greatly that out of 6-10 million species we only identified 1 million and that we don't concentrate on the other organisms that aren't as big and important as us. Q2:Why would Peter Ward refer to Homo sapiens as an "asteroid?" A2:Peter Ward would refer to homo sapiens as an asteroid because that's what we are in a way. We are an asteroid by when we came to earth we started destroying the ecosystem and disturbing nature like an asteroid. So with every new invention more of our asteroid hits earth such as cars and the gas they use. |
Sung Hee Age: 16 New York |
Q1: Compare the views of
Peter Ward to Daniel Simberloff. A1: Peter Ward thinks that a mass extinction kills species and Daniel Simberloff thinks nature of the impacts of introduced species on native species and ecosystems allows inferences about extinction rates. The evidence all points to a global tragedy with a profound loss of biodiversity. Q2:Why would Peter Ward refer to Homo sapiens as an
"asteroid?" |