The current mass extinction has been unfolding for millennia, and unlike the greenhouse effect, global warming, or the hole in the ozone, it is visible without sophisticated imagery or complex computer modeling. It is real, and it is happening to a greater or lesser degree all over the globe; it is most apparent, however, in the tropics. It will not eliminate life from the Earth; no mass extinction does that. But enough species will die that the nature of life on the Earth will be forever changed.

Many scientists dispute whether an extinction is currently taking place at all, or suggest that we are facing the prospect but have not yet begun the experience. Others agree that we are indeed in a period of increased extinction, but that the net result will little change the Earth's flora and fauna. I do not share such a sanguine view. I believe that the current extinction is well under way, having started with the dawn of the Ice Age, about 2.5 million years ago, and since then accelerating in its rate of species destruction. In some ways it is very much like the dinosaur-killing event of 65 million years ago, when a biosphere already stressed by rapid changes in climate and sea level was knocked into mass extinction by the impact of asteroids, striking, according to new evidence, simultaneously in North and Central America. A very similar scenario is currently unfolding. Over 2 million years ago, giant glaciers began to cover large portions of the planet, changing climate and sea level on a global scale in the process. And then, 100,000 years ago, another great asteroid hit Earth, this time in Africa. That asteroid is named Homo sapiens.

Peter Ward

We are surely in the midst of a mass extinction. Even though it's hard to compare past extinction rates with that of the present, given missing data from the past, we do know how to identify extinction periods: the elevation of extinction rates in those periods are at least a hundred-fold over the slow "background" rate of "normal" extinction.

Of about 6 to 10 million currently existing species, we have still only identified 1 million; we know more about vertebrate species than we do about plants and insects. But for groups that we know well, knowledge of very recent species extinctions -- and for current species, their ranges and the threats to them -- allows us to be certain that extinction rates are comparable to those of the great past extinctions. For example, for birds, of about 10,000 species worldwide, at least 128 have disappeared in the last 500 years, about 1,200 are currently seriously threatened with extinction (all but three from human activities); there is a real prospect of the loss of 500 bird species within this century.

For less well-known groups, we must use inference. We know there is a rough relationship between the area of a patch of habitat and the number of species it will contain. Since habitat destruction is the leading cause of endangerment and extinction, and we have data on the rate of habitat destruction, we can estimate rates of extinction in some cases. Introduced species -- those who migrate to a new area -- are the second leading cause of endangerment and extinction. Information on the rate of species introduction and the nature of the impacts of introduced species on native species and ecosystems allows inferences about extinction rates. The evidence all points to a global tragedy with a profound loss of biodiversity.

Daniel Simberloff


Compare the views of Peter Ward to the views of Daniel Simberloff.

Why would Peter Ward refer to Homo sapiens as an "asteroid?"


More  Evolution Questions

Evolution 2

Evolution 3

Evolution 4

Evolution 5

Evolution 6

Evolution 7

Evolution 8

Evolution 9

Evolution 10

Read Responses


Your first name:    Your age:   Your country:

If you want to receive your evaluation by e-mail, enter your full e-mail address here:

Submitted by:
Mrs. Dimino's Eighth Grade Life Science Classes
JFK Middle School
Port Jefferson Station, New York

National Educational Technology Standard:
Students use technology tools to enhance learning, increase productivity and promote learning.
 Concepts/Skills: Interpreting, inferring, analyzing, synthesizing